KwaZulu Natal's 1,050 Elephants at Risk
- 1 day ago
- 5 min read
Bizarre Elephant Removal Sparks Alarm
Green light for poachers and a catch to South Africa’s 150-elephant trophy hunting plan raises urgent conservation concerns
Proposed Relocation Raises Concerns
A storm is erupting over Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife's proposal to “move” 1,050 elephants from KwaZulu-Natal reserves.
When we examine the overall picture, including missing regular data on elephant numbers, existing actual elephant populations, serious management challenges, warring between different authorities, growing reports of heightened, unchecked hunting, and visible unease among various communities, the official justification raises a serious alarm.
These concerns reinforce persistent questions about the removal of wildlife from regional parks. While direct evidence is not publicly available, the pattern of ambiguity and limited transparency undermines confidence in the proposal's stated intentions.
This mirrors our earlier controversial report, “Mkhuze: Destruction of a Provincial Jewel,” which drew considerable reaction. https://www.lionexpose.org.za/post/mkhuze-game-reserve-the-destruction-of-a-provincial-jewel
This publicity also risks sending a signal that elephant populations are expendable.
Risk of Increased Poaching and Hunting
In such an environment, organised ivory syndicates may see an opportunity to continue blatant poaching, overtly assisting authorities to solve their so-called overpopulation problem.
The elephant proposal is also alarmingly close on the heels of our recent South African plan to reinstate trophy hunting export quotas with 150 elephants on the list, or 300 tusks. That draft plan is currently pending final approval following the public comment period that ended on March 8, 2026.
Is this massive relocation proposal merely the "catch" to a plan that floods KZN with elephant trophy hunts?
Evidence of Oversight Failures
Two recent cases of human-elephant conflict involving elephants under regional management can be used to demonstrate a prolonged lack of effective oversight by regional authorities and the consequences of such failures, even though these two examples stemmed from private reserves. Many preceding incidents were not reported, and a comprehensive understanding of the situation only emerged following significant public exposure.
Pongola Case
In Pongola, elephants were systematically targeted and killed for their tusks openly during daylight hours. International attention was drawn to the issue only after tourists on Jozini Dam were terrified, thinking they had been fired upon. Surviving elephants had also been seen with bullet wounds and sustained injuries, exhibiting severe distress. War elephant behaviour. When elephants seek refuge in forests during daylight and travel at night, looking for safe places. These incredible war elephants continue to move between South Africa and Eswatini along a precarious survival corridor. In a talk session late last year, Eswatini representatives asked what KwaZulu-Natal authorities are doing about the elephants. The whole saga remains largely muzzled. https://kzn.da.org.za/2023/01/da-condemns-mass-slaughter-of-pongola-lake-elephants-calls-for-national-intervention
Mawana Case
In 2023, following a mass cull of game animals on Mawana Game Reserve, the Mawana elephants were thrown into the global spotlight. Although the cull did not include the elephants, it highlighted the backdrop of years-long elephant-human conflict. Despite continuous reporting, community updates, and severe warnings, well documented and driven by our reports, on 31 August 2024, nine of the Mawana elephants were gunned down, including pregnant cows and calves. A young bull of four had previously been gunned down on a soccer field, his life sacrificed. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2024-09-22-how-frightful-failures-and-feuding-set-up-kzn-elephant-herd-for-destruction/
Pressure and Suppression
We also experienced what it is like to speak up and expose systematic exploitation and faced severe pressure and bullying, including attempts by an NGO to actively suppress our efforts to raise the alarm. The whole elephant saga, ongoing since 2016, eventually led to a South African parliamentary inquiry in May 2025, which summoned regional authority Ezemvelo to Parliament, exposing the lack of support for rural landowners and the shocking failure to protect these elephants. The Mawana elephants were herded onto a private game farm, community land and the saga is ongoing.
The Broader Ivory Trade
Across Africa, the illicit ivory trade continues to operate with extreme sophistication, slaughtering elephants en masse and moving tusks onto international markets in the Far East. Large seizures of ivory are reminders of the scale of these networks, what goes unrecorded is far greater.
Local Indicators
Locally, within KZN parks, in close proximity to these parks there is evidence of increasing demand for elephant carvings and furniture, along with lion body parts. All operating in plain sight with no law enforcement authority, taking an interest in investigating.
Elephant Population Estimates
We did some quick research to pull together publicly available estimates of elephant numbers in KZN reserves. Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park is reported to have roughly 700 elephants. Tembe Elephant Park is “now home to 250 elephants”, according to publicly available information published on Wikipedia. Mkhuze Game Reserve recorded approximately 139 elephants based on old reports. Ithala Game Reserve supports a resident elephant population introduced in the 1990s, with reports of herds moving outside reserve boundaries.
However, precise current counts are not publicly published, even though a 2025 management plan for Ithala is underway. The proposal to relocate 1,050 elephants in the province would encompass a very large proportion of the total population.
Growing Concerns and Lack of Transparency
The proposal also takes on a far darker significance.
Carefully managed media releases narrow scrutiny, leaving public trust hanging in the balance. At what point does this scale of uncertainty demand international attention?
If transparency continues to fall short, global wildlife protection bodies and transnational trafficking investigation agencies must step in. Before any potential decisions of this magnitude are made, there should be sufficient public accountability.
Tell us how, in practical terms, authorities plan to finance and move 1,050 elephants.
The province's elephants and our regional parks remain under the control of an authority facing rising public scrutiny. An iron fist descending slowly, taking more and more chances, capturing the very animals we should be protecting.
Those baby elephants we saw, the tightly bonded families moving through the landscape.
Could these elephants, our heritage, be changed forever, exhibiting more and more war elephant behavior, hiding, watching, moving silently, learning from their parents.
These safe wild spaces where we rule, are no longer safe.
©️LionExpose
Note
During visits, extensive sections of three of these reserves were repeatedly inaccessible, despite having official maps and on different occasions. Authorities attribute these closures to rain. Yet, after years of navigating similar or more challenging Zululand and Mpumalanga terrain, both during and after heavy rainfall, this explanation appeared inconsistent with the conditions on the ground. Many roads seemed overgrown, blocked, or even barricaded for prolonged periods. An informer in one area told us elephants had gone missing.
Disclaimer
This report is a direct exercise of the right to freedom of expression and the duty to hold power accountable, serving as a critical exposure of the systemic capture of our natural heritage by interests that prioritize exploitation over genuine conservation. The findings herein are based on field investigations, documented management failures, and information gathered through an extensive bush telegraph network regarding a bizarre removal proposal that could effectively clear a shocking number of the province’s primary elephant sanctuaries. We published this protected comment to provoke immediate public action since official transparency is lacking.